« All work, All play, and No computer makes me a productive boy | Main | Forgot to mention »

January 28, 2008

The really angry gay marriage rant

About a year ago, Derrick and I had a bit of an exciting event. After gathering all the proof (years of shared bank accounts, rent contracts, etc.) we became domestically partnered. The main benefit of being partnered is that I could add him onto my medical coverage, because being domestically partnered doesn't help on much else.

I don't want some church to bless my relationship. However, I could have walked into the city clerk office with a woman I picked up off the street, married her, and every state and federal office would treat us as one unit. Because we're gay (regardless that my relationship with Derrick has outlasted many friends' marriages), we still have to carry documents around that say that he has a right to visit me in the hospital and that he has the authority to make decisions if I'm incapacitated. Of course, in states with strong pro-family laws, even those documents would be ignored. Makes google maps very difficult to plot, sometimes, because of the fear of having an accident there.

Zod forbid that we try to do things like rent a car together. We went with a straight couple on a road trip, and I wanted to add someone else on as a secondary driver. Derrick wasn't allowed (not a real relationship), but my straight friend's wife could have claimed to be my wife and she would have been added without any question.

Back to the good news of the first paragraph- I just got the latest insult. I had tried to check in advance, but no one seemed to know until I received the letter today from our office of labor relations.

"Based on IRS policy, health benefits provided to domestic partners are considered additional income. This additional income is subject to all federal, state, and local tax plus social security/medicare taxes."

Guess how much? Almost 4 thousand bucks. Thank you so much for telling me this AT THE END OF THE YEAR. This will be added onto my W2, but without having any taxes withheld. This means that I will have an instant additional tax liability of approximately $1600. Taxes, if Derrick had big breasts and a vajayjay, I wouldn't be liable for.

Once again, I don't want some church recognizing my rights. They can bar me from the building and I'll be just fine, really. However, my relationship with my partner is as good as any straight couple, and it is not right that I am taxed more than a couple of identical income.

I'm getting really fed up. Those of you out there who think gay marriage is a threat to America (I'm talking to you, my sanctimonious little shit of a Ten Commandments-breaking uncle in Arizona who has donated money to anti-gay movements), look really hard in the mirror, because the only thing shameful and sinful is you. We don't want to be in your bedroom either, nor do we need you to accept us, at least in the privacy of your homes. But as soon as you step outside of your own little lily-white enclave, I should have the exact same rights as you- in the workplace, in federal and state rights, and in my pursuit of happiness.

WWJD? He'd give me a hug for putting up with all this crap, thank me for recycling and taking public transportation, working with at-risk kids, doing the Peace Corps, then begin clearing all the greedy bastards out of the temple.

Posted by G at January 28, 2008 08:27 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.glennalicious.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/726

Comments

amen, brother. amen.

Posted by: brian Nesbitt at January 28, 2008 09:22 PM

Amen. Amen. That is by far one of the best discussions of this topic I have read in a while. I'm sorry that you guys are subject to additional taxes without being told upfront. *HUGS*

Posted by: James at January 28, 2008 09:27 PM

Word.

Posted by: Brian at January 28, 2008 09:35 PM

Great rant Glenn! Sorry to hear about the taxes and it's shitty that they didn't tell you up front. My company has been taxing me each month for my partner being on my dental plan and as annoyed as I was when I found that out I'm really glad they did it that way. WWJD - he'd smite all the narrow minded a-holes that want to deny love between two men or two women. :)

Posted by: Chris at January 28, 2008 09:39 PM

Sorry, Glenn. And this is what we're supposed to be grateful for ... I'm tired of being told we're supposed to be happy for the little tainted crumbs that are thrown at us.

Scott and I are registered as domestic partners in Seattle and the State of Washington - maybe we'll go in person and re-do that. But we can't decide which of us would be more passable in drag.

Posted by: Matt at January 28, 2008 10:23 PM

RIGHT ON.

It sickens me to think of how different things might be if we had Gore in the white house, especially considering his comments of the past week supporting full marriage rights for ALL citizens.

Thanks for your rant - It helps to sometimes live vicariously through someone else's anger for a change :).

Posted by: Jeff at January 28, 2008 10:31 PM

This happened to me a few years ago. I was able to get my money back from my employer after a little research because I paid more than half of my partner's living expenses (or something like that). It took a little research and some back and forth, but at the end of the day, I simply signed an affidavit and got my money back. I know this won't apply to everyone, but you should definitely do a little research and see if there is some way around it. It worked for me. BTW, I made about 3 times more money than my partner at that time and he wound up getting throat cancer that year. Since I had a "gold-plated" insurance policy, he got great care, there were literally no co-pays for the surgery and radiation and three years down the road, he's still cancer-free. He was also able to leave his low-paying job and move to a much, much better job because he didn't have to worry about health insurance. Now, he makes more money than me!!!

Also, you should be aware there is a bill before Congress regarding Tax Equity for Health Plan Beneficiaries. Please see http://www.hrc.org/laws_and_elections/5671.htm.

Good rant, though. It's an issue that warrants much more publicity.

Posted by: The Bum at January 29, 2008 07:51 AM

I just peed myself a little.

Posted by: PatCH at January 29, 2008 01:29 PM

It's really sucky that it would be locally taxable, since NYC supposedly recognizes your partnership. In DC, Domestic Partner benefits are federally taxable, but not subject to DC tax. I know that NJ is the same way.

Posted by: tom at January 29, 2008 01:32 PM

This is exactly why Hillary's position that "the states should decide" on gay marriage is total bullshit.

Posted by: Barry at January 29, 2008 02:48 PM

Same crap deal with airline flight benefits..."family members" (wives, husbands, children) no taxes on tickets need be processed (absorbed by the company), but for domestic partners, full fed and international taxes apply...almost not even a benefit, because you end up paying almost the same for other non-spousal companions anyway.

As for Hillary, she woos us bigtime, but you know she'll fuck us over royally if it suits her reelection plan.


Posted by: Mike at January 29, 2008 08:25 PM

Amen!!!

I got so sick and tired of being told that gay relationships aren't "real" relationships, that "civil unions" are the same as marriages so just shut up and live with the different names, etc said by the anti-SSM asshats. Luckily, I get the chance to tell them to shove it up their posteriors.

Posted by: Lee at January 30, 2008 06:32 AM

My brother is right... as usual. It is truly a horrible thing that this discrimination exists. It's even more horrible that people that call themselves "Christian" continue to ignore everything Christ said about love. A friend of mine pointed out to me recently that "Christians are now known more for whom they hate than whom they love". A sad truth.
It's a good rant. A worthy rant. And, for the record... a person of faith who believes in Christ's message feels that God's son would have been proud of my little brother.

Posted by: Bonnie at January 30, 2008 08:03 PM

There is an IRS provision that will allow you to You can keep 100% of your medical benefits if your partner qualifies as your dependent. If you can prove that you contribute at least 50% of his support (e.g.: if you make roughly the same salary or if he makes slightly less). Please talk to an accountant. I had a similar issue and was able to qualify my partner as a dependent. There is a worksheet you can fill yourself to see if you come close qualifying (IRS publication 17 I think). Good luck!

Posted by: Rey at January 31, 2008 09:06 AM

another thing marriage does is prevent former spouses from running out on modest alimony payments just because they're feeling particularly vindictive. turns out the domestic partnership contract means very little then too. alas.

Posted by: jwc at January 31, 2008 06:02 PM

It's sad how some reactionaries are trying to taint the word "family" so that it will exclude every sort of family they don't like.

Welcome to mine.

Posted by: Randy McDonald at February 1, 2008 12:06 AM

Brilliant! You tell 'em!

Someday these bigots will get it, and even if they don't they will have to deal with it, 'cause our day will come!

Well done.

Posted by: Gary at February 1, 2008 01:10 AM

AMEN AMEN AMEN!

I can't add much more than that b/c that was a rant worthy of one of my own :-)

I really think we all should say f-the-usa and emigrate to Holland... all rational thought, creativity, art and intelligence would suddenly start speaking Dutch!

Posted by: TOS at February 1, 2008 09:52 PM

I almost feel guilty for being Canadian. This August past, after 20 years as a couple, R and I were married in a quite civil ceremony.

Not much was changed for us because OUR Federal Gov had extended same-gender, common-law couple equality from a federal perspective a few years ago. We've been filing jointly for a number of years now and my employer gives group benefit coverage was for all couples regardless of gender or married/common-law.

The marriage, blessed at the federal level, cannot be overridden at the provincial. Yes, it's a good idea to keep the card with us - a strange hospital may require some proof I'm his spouse but the same could be said for other couples when the question is "Can we perform this emergency procedure?"

I wish you and Derrick all the best going forward - frankly the same for your country.

Of course, if you and Derrick somehow found your way to emigrate up north... Montréal would be a nice location for you two - close to the border. Hint hint hint.

Posted by: Jim (The Canuck One) at February 3, 2008 03:04 PM

WHAT YOU SAID.

Posted by: goblinbox at February 5, 2008 11:09 PM